Wednesday, August 26, 2020

PROMOTING RECOVERY WORKING WITH COMPLEX NEEDS Essay - 1

Advancing RECOVERY WORKING WITH COMPLEX NEEDS - Essay Example ....................................................... 4 V. Assessment of Assessment and Medical Intervention Based on Published Literature, Policy and Legislation ........... 5 VI. Exercises Learned from Working with Patient X ....................... 7 References †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦... 9 †11 Introduction Patient X is 70 years of age male patient with dementia who was oblivious at the time he was admitted to NHS clinic on account of medication overdose (substance abuse). The patient’s neighbor revealed that a vacant jug of benzodiazepines. Since the patient was living all alone, it was his neighbor who carried him to the emergency clinic when he saw persistent X lying unwittingly on the floor. After portraying the evaluation and care given to tolerant X, this examination will exhibit the multifaceted nature of the issue and how thi s bestows on the ailment of the patient and the specialist organizations. As a component of the principle conversation, the patient’s medical issues including the conceivable causative elements, how the patient was surveyed, and the clinical mediation used to spare the life of the patient will be portrayed in subtleties. In accordance with this, the adequacy of these appraisal and clinical mediation will be assessed dependent on distributed writing, strategy and enactment. Subsequent to experiencing reflection concerning the procedure of care, exercises gained from working with persistent X will be given. Intricacy of the Problem and How this Imparts on the Illness of the Patient and the Service Providers Patient X has a mind boggling social insurance needs in light of his extreme dementia, tranquilize overdose and genuine eating issue. The way that the patient was admitted to the medical clinic oblivious builds the unpredictability of the patient’s medical issue. Benz odiazepine is a calming drug that is usually used to actuate rest or decrease the degrees of nervousness. To keep away from trance like state, respiratory discouragement, focal sensory system wretchedness or troublesome demise brought about by medicate overdose on benzodiazepines (Ngo et al. 2007; Dart 2003, p. 811), it is critical to evaluate and give care and treatment to the patient moving forward without any more unsettling the patient’s wellbeing condition. Since the patient is as of now old, there is a high hazard that quiet X is experiencing different maladies like diabetes or heart-related issues. Hence, wrong treatment given to the patient could make tolerant X experience the ill effects of heart failure including different sorts of medical issues, for example, respiratory discouragement. With respect to the specialist organization, the instance of patient X is touchy since wrong choices made concerning the patient’s evaluation and care could jeopardize the li fe of patient X. Given that understanding X have relatives who might guarantee for his body, there is a solid chance that clinical experts working in the specialist co-op could confront lawful issues identified with clinical morals and carelessness. Patient’s Health Problems including Its Causative Factors Dementia can happen in view of maturing or unreasonable admission of liquor. In accordance with this, few examinations clarified that over the top drinking of liquor could cause genuine neurological harm on the mind (Mak 2008; Kapaki 2006). Due to patient’s mature age, psychological wellness issue and poor public activity, the patient’s nature of living was seriously influenced. Dementia is a genuine wellbeing condition since the patient has misfortune his subjective capacity which causes the patient to experience the ill effects of bewilderment (Lamont 2004).

Saturday, August 22, 2020

The Ethics Of War Essays - Applied Ethics, Catholic Social Teaching

The Ethics Of War Root Entry MatOST MatOST Microsoft Works MSWorksWPDoc Jason Bennett Ethics I 5-11-98 Paper #2 The Ethics of War Discussed I decide to do my paper on the morals of war, and plan to talk about the profound quality and rules of war. Probably the main motivation that I picked this point is that I was in the Army for a couple of years, and consequently have some understanding and worry regarding the matter of war. I don't feel that my sentiments will be one-sided as I can even now investigate the contentions, however I do plan to contend that the ethical quality of war is comparative with the circumstance. I am commonly in concurrence with the writer's of the articles in our course book, and have peruse and comprehend their contentions. In Morality of Atomic Armanent, Connery talks about when it is and isn't passable to utilize atomic weapons to determine a contention. He begins with a few articulations that set the pace for his contention. He says that Wars of animosity are consistently impermissible and The just barely war is a protective war.... This implies it is never passable to assault another nation, except if they have assaulted or incited you. Presently this could be contended since there are numerous circumstances that I accept would warrant military hostility, that would not require a genuine earlier demonstration of power. For model, the circumstance in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait during Operation Desert Tempest. Sadam Hussien didn't assault the United States, nor did his activities compromise the lives of U.S. residents. I emphatically accept notwithstanding, that the U.S. had each right, if not a commitment to intercede with military power. The U.S. had monetary interests to ensure, just as the protection of a little nation that couldn't guard itself against the threatening assault. Connery additionally examines the sum and sort of power that is admissible. He says, In a cautious war, just corresponding reactions are admissible to answer animosity. A special case is conceivable if the foe is uncommonly very much furnished and prone to utilize dis-proportionate power. For occasion, if my adversary were in control of atomic bombs which I had great motivation to accept he would utilize, it would be self-destructive for me to pick the all the more relaxed accuracy bombarding. This implies if the circumstance could be settled with a restricted showcase of military power, at that point it isn't essential or allowable to surpass this degree of animosity in the assault. Nonetheless, if the adversary you are confronting has better weapons or is willing than utilize destroying power against you, at that point you are allowed to utilize whatever activities important to resolve the circumstance and spare your own nation. Most of Connery's contention centers around the profound quality of pursuing aimless fighting on non-warriors, for example non-fighters, regular folks. In his article he says: Moralists concur that the noncombatant may not be the immediate objective of any dangerous weapon, enormous or little. This implies one may neither purposely point his assault at noncombatants nor drop bombs without qualification on soldiers and noncombatants the same. Such shelling would be in opposition to sound good standards, regardless of whether turned to just in counter. In any case, allowed an adequately significant military objective which proved unable be securely disposed of by any less intense methods, atomic bombarding would be ethically advocated, regardless of whether it included the resultant loss of a enormous fragment of the non military personnel populace. It is assumed, obviously, that the great to be accomplished is at any rate equivalent to the normal harms. I would will in general concur with this contention, that it would be ethically passable to bomb regular people as long as the end legitimizes the methods. Be that as it may, what legitimizes the brutal butcher of blameless individuals? Connery says, But to be advocated, the loss of regular citizen life must be unavoidable and adjusted by a proportionate great to the protector. This view isn't shared by Ford, who in his article The Hydrogen Bombarding of Cities, he contends that it is never allowable to execute noncombatants. It is never allowed to kill legitimately noncombatants in wartime. Why? Since they are guiltless. That is, they are guiltless of the rough also, dangerous activity of war, or of any nearby support in the brutal and dangerous activity of war. It is

Sunday, August 16, 2020

World Cup Finals

World Cup Finals A story from a few years ago: During the 1994 World Cup, I lived in Somerset County, New Jersey, where the Italian soccer team happened to be staying and practicing. I had an enormous crush on one of their star players, Roberto Baggio. (It was in no small part due to his braids, Ill admit.) My family went to watch them run drills at a nearby soccer field one afternoon, I bought posters of him in Little Italy, NY, and even went to an opening-round game at Giants Stadium (I think) to cheer for the Azzurri. Sadly, Baggio missed the final penalty kick in the World Cup final match against Brazil. I had a good cry about it and vowed that I would never support penalty kicks as a way of deciding a winner. (Side note: Roberto Baggio actually (awesomely) continued playing soccer after that miss and had a great career) Which is why I celebrated with a heavy heart yesterday. I watched the first 80 minutes of regulation play in my apartment, but couldnt stand the intensity of the game so I went out to run errands. While walking along Polk Street in San Francisco, I could eventually tell how each team was doing based on where I was. For instance, if I passed a French bistro and heard patrons cheer, I knew France had possession of the ball. During PKs, I heard an Italian trattoria erupt and learned France had missed a PK. Crowds of people clustered around sports bars with large televisions that faced the sidewalk, and for the last 3 PKs I joined them. And so the countdown to 2010 begins.

Wednesday, May 13, 2020

The Problem Of Elderly Substance Abuse - 1490 Words

People are often surprised to learn that elderly people abuse drugs and alcohol at extremely high rates. In fact, elderly substance abuse has become something of an unknown epidemic in the country, impacting an ever-increasing number of people. Sadly, this problem is often ignored or misunderstood and elderly people with addictions rarely get the help they need. Hopefully this problem changes for the good before it changes for the bad. Until then, it s worth knowing more about it, including the severity of its impact and where it originates. In this way, you can make an informed decision on treatment, whether for yourself or a loved one. The Impact Is Shockingly Huge Elderly addiction is a complex problem and one that has devastated a†¦show more content†¦As a result, an increasing number of seniors (who may already be suffering from physical and mental health problems and who may be on a fixed budget) are becoming addicted to the medicines that were supposed to help them. Addiction to prescription medication is an often poorly understood problem and one that can quickly tear a person s life and health to shreds. Those are just the two most common substance abuse problems in the elderly. Elderly people also suffer from addiction to cocaine, heroin, morphine, marijuana, and many other substances. Medical marijuana use has become increasingly common in elderly people. This is understandable for people who have severe pain, but the use of more serious substances is problematic in the elderly. The heart of an older person is likely to give out more quickly when they use cocaine, even if they re a regular user. The Influences On This Epidemic What is causing this high rate of addiction in the elderly population? Primarily, it seems, depression and anxiety. One study found that 63 percent of elderly people that abused drugs said that their use was influenced by these twin totems of mental health disorder. These feelings were related to the realities of aging, such as physical pain, loss of friends and family, and problems with financial stability. That s why it s not too shocking that an additional 30 percent said that financial problems influenced

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Management Style Essay Free Essays

If there are problems between staff, I am the one who needs to find a way for the problem to be worked out so that the staff can go back to doing their job to the best of their ability. I need to be able to fire/let someone go if they are not working well for the position and I am the one that gets the biggest stress from work. Live that being a manager means you have good time management, are a good judge of character can handle problem situations in a timely professional manner and be able to make staff understand that we are all working together for the best outcome of the company/place of employment. We will write a custom essay sample on Management Style Essay or any similar topic only for you Order Now A few bad qualities a manager can have are temper problems, a complex where they believe they are better than co-workers and staff alike, someone only wants to do their paperwork job and ignoring staff. This means that you can’t just do the paper work and hiring, you have to know what the main goals are but if everyone sees their manager as a bad manager because nothing is getting better then you should rethink your priorities as a manager. Qualities of a person, management or staff, can change based off of different situations in their lives but that is when a positive attitude can come into play. If a family member has passed away you may not want to work but sometimes you have to set things aside and do your best while working. All aspects of being a manager do not change; you have to take care of everything that is needed for your position and just take it one day at a time. Team Work While taking my Management Quiz, it all seemed like common sense. My results showed that I am doing great in the team work area, meaning that I know how to get staff on the same page about all goals and plans that need done. It stated that I know how to delegate and how to make sure that results are what want them to do be. As a team that can be hard but do realize that everyone is different and it takes different managing methods for some. One person I may have to show how to do something while another only have to tell them what was wrong. Managing People My people managing skills on the quiz showed that I know how to manage people in general. That would include being able to hire the right person for the job, giving feedback as often as possible and to address any issues in a way that the person/people will understand and be able to do better with their work. I believe that talking to a person one-on-one can help them understand what it is they are doing great and what they need to improve on thou yelling or always being negative. It takes a positive attitude to have others show a positive attitude even if everything that is being done is not correct. Managing You resell The quiz stated that I am doing a great job in managing myself. This includes time management, using my authority in a way that isn’t abusing my position and understanding my role as a manager. I do know that being manager doesn’t mean get my way, it means that I am working with others to do what needs to be done for the company so that all staff works well together and hat everything is run smoothly. As a manager the biggest responsibility is on me. Have to be the one that makes sure everyone is doing their best and that am letting them know where their faults are and to do my best to help them fix any issues that they may be having. I am the one that staff comes to when there is a problem and I need to be the one to find ways to fix any issue in a way that no more issues come from the original problem. Conclusion My management quiz showed that am doing great on all aspects of the quiz ND I agree but also know that I can get better with time and knowledge. How to cite Management Style Essay, Essays

Monday, May 4, 2020

Privacy Is Overrated free essay sample

In the essay â€Å"Privacy is Overrated† written by David Plotz, Plotz conveys to the reader exactly what the title implies. Plotz feels that our privacy has been abolished, but we have nothing to be afraid of. To assert his opinion, Plotz begins the essay with facts about himself that explains ways in which he has been relieved of some privacy in his everyday life. Plotz explains that his computer’s hard drive is flooded with cookies from organizations that monitor his actions on the web, telecoms pinpoint exact locations of is phone calls, and credit reporting companies are well aware of late payments he makes. Plotz believes that the public’s privacy is being invaded by the government. He describes the government as â€Å"Big Brother† and says that â€Å"Big Brother† watches over everyone regardless of having the consent of the people or not. The government watches us, keeping tabs on everything we purchase and where we take our vacations with intentions to find clues on terrorism, according to Plotz. We will write a custom essay sample on Privacy Is Overrated or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The author believes that the information that the government obtains isn’t our true privacy, so we should turn a blind ye to â€Å"Big Brother’s† watchful eye. Plotz describes genuine privacy as the ability to share one’s desires, goals, and mistakes with others. He believes we grow to trust each other as a result of surrendering some of our privacy to â€Å"Big Brother†, which according to Plotz, helps us find a sense of worth. Plotz concludes that the government’s invasion into our lives is not only nothing to be worried about, but it is also beneficial to our relationships amongst each other, helping us to trust each other with our actual private lives.